USE CASES

Govern the workflows that carry operational consequence.

Each pattern is labeled by maturity so current capability, representative application, and longer-term direction stay clear.

EVIDENCE-AWARE POSITIONING

Four places to begin—or to explore carefully.

01

Supported

Governed infrastructure changes

Create a run, apply configured approval controls, execute through a plugin, and retain the event trail.

Trigger
An approved infrastructure change request creates a run.
Control
Policy evaluation and configured approval precede production action.
Execution
A versioned workflow crosses a bounded plugin interface.
Verification
Run status, timeline, stream, and action result retain the operational record.
02

Representative pattern

Operational request fulfillment

Translate a ticket or human request into an explicit, reviewable workflow before execution.

Trigger
A ticket or human request supplies explicit operational intent.
Control
A selected workflow remains reviewable before execution.
Execution
The representative pattern uses the same bounded run and plugin contracts.
Verification
Structured state and event history connect the request to its outcome.
03

Representative pattern

Alert-driven remediation

Connect an operational signal to a bounded response while keeping policy and approval gates visible.

Trigger
An alert or event identifies a candidate response workflow.
Control
Policy, risk, environment, and approval requirements stay explicit.
Execution
Only the selected bounded workflow crosses the execution boundary.
Verification
The run timeline records transitions and the resulting evidence.
04

Planned direction

Progressive workflow autonomy

Expand eligible decisions one workflow at a time as controls, verification, and team trust grow.

Trigger
An eligible signal may initiate future policy-controlled selection.
Control
Eligibility expands only with reviewed policy and operating evidence.
Execution
Execution remains deterministic even as decision scope matures.
Verification
Observed outcomes inform whether a workflow can earn broader autonomy.

HOW TO READ THESE LABELS

How to read the maturity labels.

Supported

Grounded in implemented repository contracts or behavior.

Representative pattern

A credible application of the architecture, presented as a pattern rather than a deployment claim.

Planned direction

A future path that depends on additional product and operational maturity.

Bring one bounded workflow and its control requirements.

Prepare a technical briefing